Bovine embryo production and transfer biotechnology is an important asset to ensure speed of cattle farming genetic gain. In recent years, we’ve seen a global increase in cattle embryo production, reaching, in 2021, almost 1.5 million bovine embryos transferred according to the data collated by the International Embryo Technology Society (IETS).
The process of embryo production and subsequent transfer, rely on two types of techniques:
In both cases the viable embryos can be transferred into a recipient female or frozen for unlimited storage.
The in vivo technology has been developed for the first time in cattle in 1920 in the UK from Rowson and colleagues, but it took another 50 years until 1970 for this technology to really become a commercially valuable reality for the breeding dairy and beef industry. With commercialisation of porcine pituitary extracts FSH/LH superovulation was made possible. More recently, with the generation of recombinant bovine FSH these technologies are used as a tool to maximise the genetic output of a female bloodline.
The use of embryo production allows ultimately the maximisation of the usage of the genetic potential of donor cows, superovulation requires donors to be at least pubertal and the initiation of the process. The level of embryos averagely collected from cows and heifers has not changed over the years; it has remained quite stable, with an average collection between 6 and 8 transferrable embryos per flushing.
The flushing procedure can be performed only in non-pregnant animals that have passed at least 45 days from parturition. Meanwhile, they have recovered a functional cyclicity and have perfect uterine health. The superstimulatory procedure cannot be repeated before 45 to 60 days from the last flushing; these are limiting factors that are less relevant for the use of in vitro embryo production. In fact the application of OPU can be performed even in prepubertal heifers as well as pregnant cows during the first trimester, as this procedure aspirates oocytes contained inside the follicles that are detectable from an ultrasonografic examination.
In the last decade the introduction of genomic testing at commercial level has allowed to identify 4 population of animals, and their characteristics can be correlated to a correct breeding program involving embryo transfer:
The insertion of embryo transfer in the breeding strategy of a given dairy farm, allows to import genetic potential of females from any part of the globe to match at best the genetic characteristics of the herds with the unlimited combinations to improve the health and productive performances of their animals.
Embryo transfer can be used in dairy cows to improve pregnancy establishment vs artificial insemination in 2 different conditions.
The first is during periods of heat stress. Most of the infertility caused by heat stress is because of damage to the oocyte and early embryo, these two are the most heat vulnerable elements of the breeding process. By the time an embryo is transferred, at the blastocyst stage, the embryo has acquired resistance to the maternal environment thermally stressed. As a result, there can be a large improvement in pregnancy rate using ET in summer, and there is little or no seasonal variation in P/ET even in hot climates. For this reason, using embryo transfer to substitute AI during the summer period is a way to stabilise pregnancy establishments per month in countries with hot summers.
The other situation in which ET can improve pregnancy outcomes is for the repeat-breeder cow. These cows are usually defined as those that have been inseminated 3 or more times without the establishment of pregnancy. Several studies have shown that pregnancy success after ET in repeat-breeder cows can be greater than for AI. One of the largest study, from Rodrigues et al., 2007, analysed the results from 5,693 AI and 3,858 ET in repeat breeder Holstein cows where pregnancy rates were greater after ET (41.7%) than after AI (17.9%).
The reason why ET improves fertility is unclear and causes of the repeat-breeder syndrome are likely to differ between individual cows and between herds of cows. Some causes of the repeat breeder syndrome, such as reduced oocyte quality could be improved by ET, the oocyte step is bypassed as the cow used as recipient will benefit from the oocyte of the donor animal, whereas other causes, such as alterations in uterine function, would not be impacted by ET.
Embryo transfer is a well-established technology for the breeding of cattle. The use of either in vivo or in vitro production consent the exploitation of the maternal lineage genetic potential at a much higher level than artificial insemination. Embryo transfer consent the infusion of genetics from any parts of the World without the needing of the transfer of live animals, avoiding the biosecurity hazards, consent the exploitation of low genetic potential females as producers of valuable offspring when used as recipients, and could improve breeding performances compared to AI in repeat breeders and in cows exposed to heat stress.
References
Betteridge KJ, Rieger D. Embryo transfer and related techniques in domestic animals, and their implications for human medicine. Hum Reprod. 1993 Jan;8(1):147-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137864.
Rodrigues, C. A., H. Ayres, R. M. Ferreira, A. A. Teixeira, R. F. Mancilha, M. E. F. Oliveira, A. H. Souza, and P. S. Baruselli. 2007b. Comparison of pregnancy rates after artificial insemination or embryo transfer in high producing repeat breeder Holstein cows. Acta Sci. Vet. 33(Suppl.1):1255 (abstr.).