Heat stress management in cattle can be critical, especially during hot summer months. Cattle, especially high-producing dairy cows, are vulnerable to high temperatures due to their high metabolic heat production. Signs of heat stress can include increased panting, drooling, decreased feed intake, and prolonged standing time. As global temperatures rise due to climate change, effective mitigation strategies are of high importance to ensure the health and welfare of our animals. In this article, we outline key areas to manage cattle heat stress, covering environmental modifications, nutritional adjustments, and technological interventions.
One of the most interesting and effective ways to mitigate heat stress is altering and/or modifying the facilities on the farm in order to provide effective tools that minimize heat impact on cattle. Strategies may focus on decreasing solar exposure, promoting heat dissipation, and/or maximizing animal comfort. We will briefly go through some of these strategies.
Providing shade will help reducing solar heat exposure contributing to animal comfort and welfare. Cows have a low resistance to high temperatures and will be easily in heat stress if solar exposure is high. Cows that have access to shade are able to maintain lower rectal temperatures and respiration rates, which directly correlate with better milk yield and weight gain. Different shading options can include:
Cows under shade will show increased lying time and reduced core temperatures compared to cows without shade access, particularly in grazing systems where solar exposure is higher.
In confined systems with barns, ventilation is a cornerstone of heat control. Proper ventilation dilutes humid air, increases convective heat loss, and helps manage ammonia and other gases. This is something that should be considered when building the barn, since proper ventilation depends on prevailing winds and construction strategies.
Studies show that airflow of 1.5–2.0 m/s can reduce skin temperatures by up to 3°C (West, 2003). During extreme heat, fans alone may not suffice, requiring integration with evaporative cooling methods.
These methods leverage water evaporation to absorb heat from the animal’s skin surface, significantly improving cooling efficiency.
Studies show that sprinklers combined with fans can reduce respiration rates from 90 to below 60 breaths per minute, a clear indicator of improved thermal comfort.
Water is not only a nutritional requirement but also a primary thermoregulatory tool. Heat-stressed cattle increase water consumption by up to 50%. Thus, cooling strategies must ensure ad libitum access to fresh water at all times:
There are some emerging technologies like cooling pads and hydrothermal flooring that are being used in high-value operations. These systems circulate cool water beneath resting surfaces or within rubber mats, offering localized cooling during lying periods—an important time for thermoregulation.
Ruminants, mostly due to the fermentation process, have a higher critical temperature range of 25-30ºC. Above this, heat stress alters nutrient metabolism and reduces dry matter intake (DMI). Adjusting diets can compensate for energy deficits and reduce metabolic heat production:
Bos indicus breeds (e.g., Gir, Brahman) and crossbreds exhibit greater resilience due to their skin characteristics and metabolic adaptations. Breeding for heat tolerance is a long-term strategy. This can be a effective but it takes time, and should be carefully planned, especially in milk operations, where pros and cons should be evaluated.
Precision livestock farming tools are rapidly evolving and can provide interesting solutions —such as wearable sensors and thermal imaging—that allow early detection of heat stress. Widely used examples are automated misting and fan systems triggered by temperature, and image systems that allow the early identification of heat stress signs.
Cattle heat stress management should be multidisciplinary, combining environmental modifications, nutritional strategies, and technological innovations. With increasing climate variability, proactive and adaptive approaches are essential for maintaining animal welfare and farm productivity. Research is currently focussing on scalable, affordable solutions tailored to diverse production systems and geographies.
1. West, J.W. (2003). Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(6), 2131–2144. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73803-X
2. Collier, R.J., Dahl, G.E., & VanBaale, M.J. (2012). Major advances associated with environmental effects on dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(4), 1244–1253. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72193-2
3. Schütz, K.E., Rogers, A.R., Cox, N.R., Webster, J.R., & Tucker, C.B. (2010). Dairy cattle prefer shade over sprinklers: Effects on behavior and physiology. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(11), 5557–5565. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3311
4. Igono, M.O., Johnson, H.D., Steevens, B.J., Krause, G.F., & Shanklin, M.D. (1987). Physiological, productive, and economic benefits of shade, spray, and fan systems versus shade for Holstein cows during summer heat. Journal of Dairy Science, 68(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)79984-0
5. Polsky, L., & von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2017). Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(11), 8645–8657. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12651
6. Renaudeau, D., Collin, A., Yahav, S., de Basilio, V., Gourdine, J.L., & Collier, R.J. (2012). Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production. Animal, 6(5), 707–728. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111002448
7. Hansen, P.J. (2004). Physiological and cellular adaptations of zebu cattle to thermal stress. Animal Reproduction Science, 82-83, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.011
8. Gaughan, J.B., Mader, T.L., Holt, S.M., Sullivan, M.L., & Hahn, G.L. (2010). Assessing the heat tolerance of 17 beef cattle genotypes. International Journal of Biometeorology, 54(6), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0256-3